?

Log in

No account? Create an account
curled around these images
just enough to make us dangerous
Musing... 
15th-Mar-2013 01:17 pm
Thinky thougts
I wonder if it's deliberate that Sam doesn't haven't any male friends.

I mean, I figure he had good friends at college (we know there was Zach and Brady), but we've never seen him with a male "buddy" like we have Dean. We see Dean bonding with other males - Bobby, Gordon, Frank, Cas, Garth, Benny and even John, but Sam is seen as either butting heads with them or being downright enemies of them (Lucifer, Walt, Roy, Gordon, Kubrick, Greedy).

I know that Sam was close to Bobby but not in the same way that Dean was. Same with Garth and Cas. Both Garth and Cas attached themselves to Dean first, then got to know Sam. I figure they are as close to "friends" as Sam has in the show, but they're not just his friends.

I wonder if that's because Dean fulfils that role completely? Maybe Sam doesn't need anyone else (whereas Dean possibly does?).

I'm sure not if this is because there's never been a story line that has allowed Sam to develop a male friendship or because they have deliberately made this part of Sam's character (like his disastrous relationships with women).

It's not a complaint - just an observation.

Hmmm. *hugs* Sam. Maybe books are his other companion.

This is what happens when I enjoy a day off (yay back to 4 days a week!) and get my hair done. :)



I hope they don't use Cas to miraculously "fix" Sam this time. Surely the effects of these trials can't be fixed with a mere touch to the head (I mean, they could if they wanted them to be, but I hope they can't).

That is all. :)
Comments 
15th-Mar-2013 03:20 pm (UTC)
the initiative has to come from the other party.

We don't know how his Stanford friendships formed, of course, but I wonder if that may always have been true of Sam. It's certainly the case that, for all his assertive style when it came to sex, the romantic partners we've seen him hook up with have usually taken the initiative in getting the encounter going. And between Dean's protectiveness and John's expectations, Sam has been so formed by having his relationships coming at him, as it were. Not that he's passive by nature -- in a lot of ways he's far, far more proactive than Dean -- but he's sort of reactively proactive, with rebellion or response a foundational element in all that goal drivenness.

In my usual unwholesome way of projecting my own issues on Winchesters when I write, I was meditating the other day on the thing that happens in canon where often we not only know more about how Dean reacts to Dean's stuff, we even know more about how Dean reacts to Sam's stuff. And I think to some extent that's a narrative choice on the show, but on the other hand -- my mother is a very fiercely protective type. And that means that it would often happen when I was growing up that she would react very emotionally to things that happened in my life, often more strongly than I myself would. And I've realized since that that has left me with two interrelated tendencies: to be secretive about things that I think others might respond to emotionally, and to underreact to things myself. Maybe it's pure projection, but I see some of that in Sam. Dean and John both did so much boundary-blurring reacting to both things that happened to Sam and to Sam's choices, I wonder if that's at the root of Sam's tendency to keep secrets (even as far back as Bloody Mary), to downplay things, and maybe even within himself to be alienated from or have difficulty accessing his own primary reactions.

I think that's part of how Sam does both forgiveness and anger: in a way, they are both distancing reactions that involve defining something quite analytically (when he was angry at John in the earlier seasons, for all the bias that entailed and the emotion it involved, it was also part of a more outside perspective on how their childhood looked in relation to abstract norms than Dean had; when he forgave Cas in s7, he was working very much by empathy through analogy). My latest theory is that while Dean often gets stuck in the complications of dealing with hurt, Sam often tries to skip the experiencing hurt part and move on immediately to a more proactive process, whether that takes the form of anger or even vengeance or whether it takes the form of figuring out and understanding and forgiving. And the post 7.23 crisis gave him a situation where his usual channeling mechanism snapped, and he dealt with shock and helplessness by running off altogether into escape.
15th-Mar-2013 07:37 pm (UTC)
My latest theory is that while Dean often gets stuck in the complications of dealing with hurt, Sam often tries to skip the experiencing hurt part and move on immediately to a more proactive process, whether that takes the form of anger or even vengeance or whether it takes the form of figuring out and understanding and forgiving. And the post 7.23 crisis gave him a situation where his usual channeling mechanism snapped, and he dealt with shock and helplessness by running off altogether into escape.

Wow...yeah, that makes so much sense...wanders off to mull that over a while...
This page was loaded Sep 22nd 2019, 12:23 am GMT.